Saturday, November 6, 2010

Reel Rewind: “Pulsar”







My impetus for seeing “Pulsar” was that it is a Belgian film in the Dutch language. Since the majority of the films produced in Belgium are in French, it is a rare opportunity to experience one in that country’s other major language. And of course the film’s storyline did intrigue me as well.

Samuel (Matthias Schoenaerts) and Mireille (Tine Van den Wyngaert) are separated lovers – Sam remains in Brussels delivering pharmaceuticals for the Pharmacie Madou, while Mireille is in New York City interning at an architecture firm. It is because of Sam’s fear of being surrounded by tall buildings (there’s a lack of skyscrapers in central Brussels) that he did not go with Mireille. But Sam has no fear of technology and its instruments (webcam, e-mail, cell phone) which will keep the lovers emotionally connected even if they can’t be physically connected – or will it?

At first everything is working fine and Sam and Mireille are in frequent communication. Then slowly the technology breaks down – Sam is unable to logoff his computer’s WiFi network because someone else is on it, then someone locks him out of his network, and his e-mail account is taken over by someone. Who is this unknown someone deliberately interfering with Sam’s life and its consequential disruption with Mireille.? Must be someone close by; after all how far is Sam’s network’s range? Sam brings in IT specialists and covers his walls with a paint that blocks radio waves, all to no avail.

During this ordeal, Sam begins his own personal breakdown. Everyone is a suspect – his friends, his neighbors – who is it? Of course the “distance” between him and Mireille increases – less communication, perhaps Mireille is finding someone else of interest. Is this the outcome of a long-distance relationship helped along by an outside force or would it have happened on its own? Sam even has a physical altercation with a neighbor in his building who he thinks is responsible for the disconnection. But is it really the neighbor? Is it really any outside person? Or is it Sam’s emotional state gone haywire and his subsequent mental breakdown? When all else fails, there’s still the non-digital, non-computer ways of connecting/communicating. No radio wave blocking paint needed.

I like the cautionary tale of the effects of computer hacking/cyber problems on our lives/mental state (there have been times when I wanted to shake the laptop on which I’m writing this to within a byte of its CPU life), but the presentation of the story was a bit slow and did not always keep my attention. I suppose the slow pace was intentional to convey a gradual and not an immediate breakdown – both of the computer and of Sam. There was a Q&A session with the director, Alex Stockman, but I had to leave right after the end of “Pulsar” to wait in line for another film. Such is the film festival life.



Film Facts: Director/Writer/Producer: Alex Stockman, Cinematographer: Sébastien Koeppel, Editor: Nico Leunen, Musician: Kobe Proesmans, Producer: Kaat Camerlynck, Production Company: Corridor

Film Type: Drama, Cast: Sien Eggers (Mevrouw Luyckx), Vincent Lecuyer (Kirku), Matthias Schoenaerts (Samuel), Nico Sturm (Mark), Tine Van den Wyngaert (Mireille), Gordon Wilson (John Everts), Stefan Perceval (Upstairs Neighbor), Length: 91’, Language: Dutch, Country: Belgium, Year: 2010
No United States release date set as of this post


Images:
Left: Matthias Schoenaerts as Samuel from the website filmguide.afifest.com
Center: Graphic interpretation of “Pulsar” created by Adrean Darce Brent
Right: “Pulsar” poster from the website imdb.com

Friday, November 5, 2010

Reel Rewind: “The Human Resources Manager”







English language title - “The Human Resources Manager” / Hebrew title – “שליחותו של הממונה על משאבי אנוש “

A journey. An actual journey from one location to another, as well as one of personal discovery. That is the underlying theme of “The Human Resources Manager”. We meet the HR Manager as a work day is ending, but an emergency request from his boss, the Widow, has him investigating the allegations of a reporter regarding the death of one of the bakery’s employees. A woman has been killed in Jerusalem by a suicide bomber and she has been in the morgue, unclaimed, for a week or so and among her affects was a paycheck from the bakery. The reporter, the Weasel, threatens to write a story about the uncaring indifference of the bakery towards the death of one of its foreign workers.

The HR Manager has problems of his own – a divorce and a not-so-good relationship with his daughter, to whom he can’t keep his promises. And this inconvenient search into the circumstances surrounding the deceased woman determines that she had worked for the bakery as a cleaner on the night shift; she was fired by her night shift manager lover, but kept on the payroll by him; she was Romanian; she was actually an engineer; she had no family in Israel; and she was named Yulia. With no other recourse than to accompany the body back to Romania for return to her family and burial, the HR Manager and the reporter – the Weasel – begin the unexpected journey.

Road trip in Romania – the amusing and absurd part of the film. After arriving in Romania and finding Yulia’s ex-husband and her minor, unsocial (a kind description) son who are not legally allowed to identify her, a van full of people take Yulia’s coffin to her mother who lives days away in the mountain region of the country. The trip includes the HR Manager (who will not make it back to Jerusalem in time to take his daughter on a school trip), the Weasel (who still is negative towards the HR Manager and the bakery and who is the object of several unsuccessful ditching attempts throughout the mission), the Israeli Vice Consul (whose wife is the Consul and who goes along to be of official aide during the trip), the driver (whose license expired decades ago), and the son (who is trouble and troubled).

Although they don’t go over any rivers or through any woods to get to the grandmother’s house, obstacles of bureaucratic and mechanical natures cross the traveling party’s path. Despite the loss of the driver and an almost premature burial, the troupe eventually arrives at their destination. One positive along the way was that the HR Manager was able to establish a connection with Yulia’s son (if he could only do the same with his daughter). The grandmother appreciates the return of her daughter, but tells the HR Manager that he has made an error. So, in a different sort of vehicle, the HR Manager and Yulia begin the journey to rectify the mistake. Oh, and after one final attempt to leave him behind, it is fitting that the ever present Weasel joins in the correcting of the error.

“The Human Resources” entertains as it raises the question of where “home” really is for any individual and why some connections are made and other are not. And as much as money is a good thing to have, it may not always be the right thing to give. The film’s journey may not have any concrete conclusions, but it is the journey itself that provides the right questions to ponder.

There was a Q&A session after the screening and the participants were the director, Eran Riklis (who flew twenty hours to be at the screening) and the HR manager, Mark Ivanir (who lives in Los Angeles – wonder if his drive seemed as long as Eran’s flight?). “The Human Resources Manager” was filmed in Israel and Romania and Riklis said that being in the small Romania village, the “depression grew on them”, but it was a real human experience. The film is based on the novel A Woman in Jerusalem by Abraham B. Jehoshua and two main differences between the film and the book are, that in the book, the HR Manager’s boss is a man and Yulia’s home country is Russia. Riklis’ next project is the film “Playoff”, scheduled for release in 2011.

Film Facts: Director: Eran Riklis, Writer: Noah Stollman, Novelist: Abraham B. Jehoshua, Cinematographer: Rainer Klausmann, Editor: Tova Asher, Musician: Cyril Morin, Producers: Leon Edery, Moshe Edery, Keinan Eldar, Tudor Giurgiu, Thanassis Karathanos, Talia Kleinhendler, Haim Mecklberg, Elie Meirovitz, Yogal Mogarbi, Estee Yacov-Mecklberg, Meinoff Zurhorst, Production Companies: 2-Team Productions, EZ Films, Pie Films

Film Type: Drama, Cast: Mark Ivanir (the Human Resources Manager), Gila Almagor (Widow), Reymond Amsalem (The Divorcee), Guri Alfi (Weasel), Noah Silver (The Boy), Julian Negulesco (The Vice Consul), Bogdan E. Stanoevitch (The Ex-Husband), Irina Petrescu (The Grandmother), Papil Panduru (The Driver), Danna Semo (The Secretary), Sylwia Drori (The Nun), Ofir Weil (The Morgue Worker), Roni Koren (The Daughter), Length: 103’, Languages: Hebrew, English, Romanian, Countries: Israel, Germany, France, Year: 2010
Film Trailer
Israel release date Thursday 7 October 2010
No United States release date set as of this post.


Images:
Left: Mark Ivanir as the Human Resources Manager from the website cinemotions.com
Center: Graphic interpretation of “The Human Resources Manager” created by Adrean Darce Brent
Right: “The Human Resources Manager” poster from the website smellslikescreenspirit.com

Thursday, November 4, 2010

AFI Fest 2010


Although the American Film Institute has been involved with providing a film festival since 1971 under various names and in different formats and locations, it was as AFI Film Fest that I first started attending the festival. The last time I went to the festival when it was AFI Film Fest was in June/July 1994 where, over fifteen days, it was held at Laemmle’s Monica 4-Plex in Santa Monica, California. During the festival I saw fourteen films, five sets of short films, and attended one seminar titled “Special Effects Seminar: The Creative Process”. Although the ticket price was $7.50, I bought a booklet of twenty vouchers for $100, which I exchanged for tickets; thus the tickets actually cost me $5 - a savings of 33%. Among the films I saw that year were: “Mannen På Balkongen” (“The Man On The Balcony”), “Après L’amour” (Love After Love), “The Wedding Gift”, “Der Gudene Er Døde” (“Where Gods Are Dead”), and “It’ll Have Blinking Eyes And A Moving Mouth”.

Fast forward ten years to 2004 and, sometime in the intervening years, the film festival has become simply AFI Fest. The American Film Institute has partnered with the American Film Market and the festival is now presented in November and the location of 2004’s eleven days of film is the ArcLight Cinemas in Hollywood, California. Attending the festival for the first time in a decade, I see five films and the ticket price is $11. Those five films are: “Matia Apo Nichta” (“Eyes Of Night”), “Tell Them Who You Are”, “Duck Season”, “Crimen Ferpecto” (“Ferpect Crime”), and “Erbsen Auf Halb 6” (Peas At 5:30”).

Now it is 2010 and the AFI Fest begins today primarily at the Mann’s Chinese Theatres (other venues – Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, Egyptian Theatre, and the Roosevelt Hotel) in Hollywood, California and goes through Thursday 11 November. I will see five films over the eight-day run and the tickets are free! The five films are:

The Human Resources Manager

Pulsar

Boy

Submarino

Pink Saris

This is the second year that AFI Fest has been free and located at Mann’s Chinese Theatres. I definitely enjoy the free tickets part, though I could do without the crowds and craziness of Hollywood Boulevard. Although the festival may never return further West again, I’m sure I’ll venture out to experience it as long as I’m in the neighborhood.


Image is of the AFI Fest 2010 e-mail banner

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Reel Rewind: “Un Balcon Sur La Mer”







French title – “Un Balcon Sur La Mer” / English language title – “A View Of Love”
The translation of the French title into English would be “A Balcony Overlooking The Sea” and the English language title would be “En Vue De L’amour” in French. After seeing the film, my choice for the French title would be “En Vue De L’amour”, with “A View Of Love” for the English language title.

Although my invitation to see the World Premiere of “Un Balcon Sur La Mer” is from the French Consulate of Los Angeles, the film is actually one of the screenings for the first day of the 2010 American Film Market. Of course I didn’t discover this until my arrival at the AMC Criterion theatre in Santa Monica. The AFM is an annual event in Santa Monica for industry buyers/players from around the globe. Since I am only tenuously connected to the film industry, I am pleased to attend the Market, even if I am not a potential buyer and it is just for one screening.

Well, this World Premiere is not getting off to a good start – some of the lights in the theatre are not turning off, but they go ahead and start the film. However, a few minutes into the showing of “Un Balcon Sur La Mer”, the film stops. All the lights come up and a man announces, in French and English, that they are going to start over again. This time all the lights turn off and the film is projected from the beginning without any further problems.

Real estate agent Marc enjoys working with his father-in-law and happily lives in Southern France with his wife and daughter. However, the past arrives one day, upsets his present and changes his future. The past is a girl named Cathy who Marc loved during his childhood in Algeria, before the country achieved independence. The return of Cathy into his life disrupts Marc’s domesticity and brings back memories of life in Oran before his family’s abrupt departure to escape the violence. Allowing himself to fulfill his childhood love for Cathy, Marc irrevocably changes the future for himself and his family. Perhaps it is the lack of closure in his youth that propels Marc towards this life changing behavior.

But all is not completely right. Although a number of memories of Algeria are recounted, some memories for Marc and Cathy are not shared/same ones and they should be. Has time diminished or distorted them? When Marc questions his mother about Algeria and his friend Cathy, she reveals some disturbing information that he can’t believe – won’t believe about this woman who has reentered his life. What is the truth and will Marc be able to see it through the love? Marc searches for answers and in so doing uncovers a real estate scam from inside the agency and Cathy’s role in the deception. He is able to prevent the completion of the scam and although Cathy’s complicity is undeniable, Marc chooses to be with her. She is a part of his life whose ending left a space in his heart and no matter what the reality, for Marc, now only she can give him back his first feelings of love for the girl Cathy.

Though the film does not go in the direction I thought it would (more straightforward, more anguish about his wife and daughter, rejection of the deception), “Un Balcon Sur La Mer” nevertheless provokes one’s thinking of the struggle for independence, aspects of life that still remain open, how perceptions can change, but maybe not so much. The films starts out in a calm morning in Algeria and ends in a rainy night in France and in between is the life of the boy Marc and the man Marc coming to a resolution for love. So I ask, what needs resolution in your life? Better still, what needs resolution in my life?


Film Facts: Director/Writer: Nicole Garcia, Writers: Frédéric Bélier-Garcia, Natalie Carter, Jacques Fieschi, Cinematographer: Jean-Marc Fabre, Producers: Xavier Amblard, Alain Attal, Gaëtan David, André Logie, Frantz Richard, Production Companies: Europa Corp, France 3 Cinéma, Les Productions des Trésor

Film Type: Drama, Romance, Thriller, Cast: Jean Dujardin (Marc), Marie-Josée Croze (Cathy), Claudia Cardinale (Marc’s Mother), Toni Servillo (Marc’s Colleague), Sandrine Kiberlain (Marc’s Wife), Michel Aumont (Marc’s Father-in-law), Jean-François Malet (Le gardien), Philippe Napias (Thierry), Length: 105’, Language: French, Country: France, Year: 2010
Film Trailer
France release date Wednesday 15 December 2010
No United States release date set as of this post


Images:
Left: Jean Dujardin as Marc from the website lyricis.fr
Center: Graphic interpretation of “Un Balcon Sur La Mer” created by Adrean Darce Brent
Right: “Un Balcon Sur La Mer” poster from the website cinemotions.com

Monday, November 1, 2010

Zócalo: “Do Artists Have A Moral Responsibility In War?”






This was not my first time at a Zócalo event, though the venue itself, the Petersen Automotive Museum, was a first time experience for me. Although I am a museum goer, I really didn’t have much interest in this automotive museum as I don’t drive and know nothing about cars. But after checking in with the people from Zócalo and having time before they would let us into the actual space for the Alan Riding talk, I wandered around the first floor of exhibits. In addition to the beginning history of automobiles, there were also auxiliary aspects related to passenger cars – gas station, streetcar, design studio – and a clearly marked definite order in which to view the exhibits. Very helpful. As I was just walking around the floor to pass the time, I didn’t engage in the exhibits as I normally do in an art museum. But there were visually interesting vehicles, so I took pleasure in looking at them. At least I could admire the cars aesthetically if not from an engineering perspective.

Finally, fifteen minutes before the talk was to begin, people were allowed to take the escalator to the second floor - but only if you had received a wristband at the check in table (these days it’s all on the wrist). The seating was black, cushioned folding chairs and I settled in as comfortably as I could and prepared for the lecture. Alan Riding is actually on a book tour for his new non-fiction title And the Show Went On: Cultural Life in Nazi-Occupied Paris. I was drawn to this talk by the question of morality presented, especially in combination with culture and Paris during a conflictive time in France’s history. I know that I would simply answer the lecture’s title as YES and ask a different question – “What Are The Moral Responsibilities Of Artists During War?”

Riding began by commenting on the United States/United Kingdom level of moral response by artists and writers to the two current wars. It is hardly a blip, except perhaps for Hollywood stars and Riding doesn’t believe real attention is paid to them – after all what do they know? Because of the social and political stature they enjoyed by being close to the institutes/people in power, there is more of a tradition of artists taking a stand in Latin America when things become ugly. The usual choices were – stay and endorse military regimes, stay and remain silent, stay and take up arms against the regime, or leave and campaign against a regime abroad – few did the former, many did the later (among them Caetano Veloso, Gilberto Gil, Ariel Dorfman, Isabel Allende).

The occupation in France produced similar categories into which artists, writers, intellectuals made their choice – stay and support the Nazis and (for a time, Communists), which Riding calls “true believers” (one of them was Louis-Ferdinand Destouches, known as Céline); stay and remain silent (although he could have left Paris, Pablo Picasso chose to continue working while avoiding contact with Germans); stay and fight (Albert Camus joined the Résistance); and leave (many moved to unoccupied France, as well as other countries). During the occupation performers performed (Édith Piaf, Danielle Darrieux, Maurice Chevalier) because of the need to work and writers wrote, sometimes clandestinely, because of the need to keep publishing in existence. After the war, accusations of collaboration were leveled against some of the artists and writers and the degree of interaction someone had with the Germans determined their fate. Showing moral guidance was important even if everyone was just trying to survive the occupation.

After the lecture and Q&A there was a reception for Alan Riding at another port of the second floor, but I decided to skip it. I liked the lecture and I thought of what I would do in the same situation. Would I be brave enough to risk expressing my position, even with taking precautions or would I try to stay out of the limelight? Such were the questions I pondered on the bus ride home. Will have to read Riding’s book to learn more about this time of Parisian life.

Images:
Left: Alan Riding from the website zocalopublicsquare.org
Center: Zócalo email header
Right: Front cover of And The Show Went On: Cultural Life In Nazi-Occupied Paris from the website and the showwenton.com